nextSTL Coverage of Framing a Modern Masterpiece: The City + The Arch + The River

• What “The Gateway Arch” by Tracy Campbell Tells Us About St. Louis

• Video: 2013 CityArchRiver Report to the Community

• A Plan for the Gateway Arch Leaves a St. Louis Highway in Place. But for How Long?

• Arch/Parks Tax Victory, St. Louis Regionalism and What’s Next

• The Missing Conversation About Visitor Attendance at the Gateway Arch

• Old Cathedral Begins $15M Renovation Coinciding with CityArchRiver Efforts

• Considering CityArchRiver Arch Grounds Alternatives and Why the NPS Should Go Big

• A Modest Proposal to Connect Existing Features at the Arch Grounds

• Guest Commentary: Suddenly Urgent Arch Tax Is Misguided

• Arch Grounds and Parks Sales Tax Hearing This Thursday

• Proposition P: Sales Tax Increase in St. Louis City to Fund CityArchRiver, Parks to Ask Voters for $1B

• MoDOT Calls I-70 to Boulevard Plan “Not Feasible” Because CityArchRiver2015 Says So

• MoDOT Offers Viable Alternatives to Removing Connections for Misguided I-70 “Lid”

• The Life and Death of Urban Highways

• MoDOT Announces Public Meeting to Discuss Alternatives for Lid over I-70 at Arch

• Parks and Recreation St. Louis Style

• St. Louis Set to Study Removal of Elevated I-70

• Scaled Down, Down, Down: Next Arch Grounds Revision Likely to Offer Less

• City+Arch+River Receives $20M TIGER III Grant, Awaits Possible Additional Funding

• Arch Grounds Public Comments Overwhelmingly Support Study of Urban Boulevard Conversion of I-70

• Disappearing Deadlines and Deleted Design: Time to Consider All Options for the Arch Grounds

• $578M Arch Grounds Transformation Gets Revised

• Bring In the Gondolas: Arch Grounds Plan to Include Cable Ride Across Mississippi River

• Great Arch Expectations

• City to River Shows Flexibility: A Lid and Boulevard Can Work Together

• False Connections: The Flawed Premise of Closing Streets to Promote Connectivity

• Arch Design Jury Avoided Choosing Anything that “Maybe Wouldn’t Work”

• Arch Competition Jury Details MVVA Selection, Ranks Teams

• What Does the MVVA designed I-70 Pedestrian Crossing Look Like and Does It Matter?

• More on Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates Winning the Arch Design Competition and What’s Next

• MVVA Team Wins Arch Design Competition

• “No comment.” St. Louis Fails to Weigh In on Arch Competition

• SOM-Hargreaves-BIG Crushes Competition in nextstl Poll

• Reassessing PWP-Foster+Partners-Civitas Arch Competition Design as a New Paradigm and Personal Homage to Dan Kiley

• “Rendering” a Verdict on the Arch Grounds Designs

• Five-for-Five: PWP Weighs in on I-70 Removal

• 4 of 5 Arch Competition Design Teams Recommend Highway Removal

• City to River Announces Broad Community Support for Removing I-70

• Design Team Presentations to Jury Highlight Framing a Modern Masterpiece Competition Calendar

• The Answer to Kamin’s Critique: Chicago Architecture Critic Blair Kamin Visits the Arch

• Ray Hartmann talks Framing a Modern Masterpiece and City to River

• The Arch Grounds and Accessibility Made Very Simple

• The I-70 Infrastructure Maze

• Civic Tourism, Placemaking, Road Diets, Parks and Physical Activity: A Unique Look at Issues with the Arch

• Five Arch Grounds Finalists Give Insight Into How They Will Address Complex Site

• Arch Grounds Design Competition Gets Started: First Thoughts From the Urban Workshop

Arch Grounds Competition Design Teams Full Narratives, Presentation Boards and Reviews