Failure of Fragmentation: Apr 2 Tax Hikes On St. Louis County Ballot

Failure of Fragmentation: Apr 2 Tax Hikes On St. Louis County Ballot

Another election is coming up, and that means more tax increases on the ballot to prop up fragmentation in St. Louis County. The April 2016, August 2016, November 2016, April 2017, Aug 2017, April 2108, and Aug 2018 ballots included several tax increases and bond issues. The next ballot looks much the same.

{Fragmented – EW Gateway}

{Spreading out – EW Gateway}

Fragmentation and low-productivity auto-oriented development patterns are synergizing in the St. Louis region, driving up the per capita cost of government services, transportation, infrastructure, and utilities. Despite $100Ms in opportunity costs and a soft tax base under our current approach, municipal leaders are thinking inside the box to keep their budgets balanced. They talk of the great efforts at collaboration, but what’s more visible is ever increasing taxes and continued tax giveaways to shift taxable sales around the county. What we need is more collaboration by default, but there are no mergers or disincorporations on the ballot.

  • Brentwood (Pop. 7,998)- A 0.5% sales tax for economic development.
  • Greendale (Pop. 645) Increase business license fee from $100 to $250.
  • Pacific (Pop. 7,211) A 0.5% sales tax increase for transportation.
  • Pacific (Pop. 7,211) A 0.5% sales tax increase for parks and storm water control.
  • Webster Grove (Pop. 22,886) $5M general obligation bond issue for a new fire house.
  • Kinloch Fire Protection District – Four property tax increase authorizing up to 1.24 per $100 assessed increase.

Recent news on the Kinloch Fire Protection District-

The sales tax increase in Brentwood is interesting. They have been a big winner in the sales tax chase. They won a TIF War battle with its Brentwood Promenade development right next to the state paid-for intersection of I-64 and I-170, county paid-for Brentwood Blvd, Eager, and Hanley Roads, and city-county paid-for Metrolink line. Somehow the productivity of the development pattern there isn’t covering the cost, even with the subsidy from the state, county, and city, of running a government and providing infrastructure for eight thousand people.

We’ve set up a scheme resembling Enron-style accounting where debt and liabilities are hidden in subsidiaries (municipalities). Those liabilities are piling up, and we pretend they will be confined to those municipalities forever. Do we let the system unravel on its own where munis hold on until the bitter end and dump those liabilities onto the county or do we come together before the bill gets even worse?

April 2, 2019 St. Louis County Sample Ballot


NextSTL is committed to providing original stories and unique perspectives on a variety of urban topics such as architecture, development, transportation, historic preservation, urban planning and design and public policy in St. Louis. We're always looking to add new, diverse voices to the mix. We accept anonymous tips, pitches for story ideas, and completed stories.

Learn More