• Home
    • Focus Areas
      • Groth Neighborhood Guides
      • Urban Living
      • Placemaking
      • Transportation
      • Historic Preservation
      • Environment
      • What Should Be
      • Media
    • Local Geography
      • Downtown
      • Central Corridor
      • North St. Louis
      • South St. Louis
      • St. Louis County
      • Greater St. Louis - Missouri
      • Greater St. Louis - Illinois
    • AltHome
  • Forum
    • Active Topics
    • New Posts
    • Unanswered Posts
  • Events
  • Misc
    • Photographs
    • Store
  • About
    • Who is Next?

Transportation

Realigning MetroLink to Better Serve St. Louis

Published on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 14:17
Written by Herbie Markwort
Tweet


In the post I wrote last week comparing the Grand and Central West End MetroLink stations, I concluded with a question: "Would additional stations or even a different alignment have better served the neighborhoods MetroLink passes?"

As the map at the top shows, I believe that a MetroLink alignment along Market St and Forest Park Ave would more effectively served the city's central corridor, the city's spine, than the existing alignment. The wide right-of-ways and long intersection spacings of both Forest Park Ave and Market St could easily accommodate MetroLink at-grade without significantly slowing the line's speed down. In a way, it's a shame St. Louis didn't have any money of it's own to invest in bettering MetroLink's route when it was built. But, then again, who can resist free [right-of-way]?

Glancing at the stations along this relocated transit line, a new "infill" station at Jefferson would bring convenient MetroLink service to the corporate campus for Wells Fargo Advisors and other area businesses. Adding a station at Jefferson on the existing alignment would be of limited value given the area's isolation similar to the existing Grand station.

Speaking of Grand, relocating the station north to Forest Park Ave would bring MetroLink 1/4-mile closer and within very easy walking distance to SLU making MetroLink a significantly more attractive option to the university's students and faculty. The entire main campus, in fact, would be within a 1/2-mile radius of the station as would be parts of Grand Center. Additionally, bringing the station out of the valley is much more likely to encourage transit oriented development than the existing station site.

Splitting the difference between the Grand and Central West End stations is a station at Sarah. This station would serve the growing CORTEX district as well as the small neighborhood commercial strip to the north.

Interestingly, there have been multiple proposals for a MetroLink station at or in the vicinity of Sarah St in the past. Back in 1997, when debates centered on whether the Cross County Extension should be routed north or south of Forest Park, the south-of-the-park route would have included a station at Boyle Ave before diverging from the main line. More recently, the 2003 Midtown Strategic Development Plan proposed a station at Sarah to serve the then called Technopolis business park:

Technopolis is located between two MetroLink stations - one at Euclid Ave. and one at Grand Blvd. - that are approximately 1.5 miles apart. The Midtown Plan recommends adding a new station at Sarah St., midway between the existing two stations, to directly serve Technopolis. A new, conveniently located station should add to the area's attractiveness to new businesses and employees. Also, this station, especially if developed with a park and ride facility, could add to the attractiveness as of Midtown as a residential area with easy access to downtown and other employment centers served by MetroLink.

Lastly, there are pros and cons to relocating the Central West End station to Forest Park Ave. On the up side, the station would be closer to the residential and commercial neighborhood that gives the station it's name; on the down side, the station would be on the periphery of the BJC hospital complex instead of at its heart. Also, the station would no longer be within walking distance of the Forest Park Southeast neighborhood to the south. Given the increasing density of the neighborhood north of Forest Park Ave, however, the down sides of moving the station out of the hospital campus might not be as great as they seem.

Interstate 64 is often called St. Louis's spine as it runs the length of the region's favored quarter from downtown to Chesterfield. While this may be true west of Clayton, east of the innerbelt, it is not I-64 that serves as St. Louis's spine, but rather a combination of Forest Park Ave/Market St or Lindell Blvd/Olive St. Those are the streets on which the city lives and breathes, not the highway. For that reason, it would make sense that MetroLink's spine aligned with the city's. The result would be greater intracity connectivity and an additional transportation option connecting the places we already go.
blog comments powered by DISQUS back to top
Loading

Social

FacebookTwitterGplus-32PinterestFlickrVimeoScribd

Recommended Events

JUN
21

Thu, Jun 21, 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Elevate St. Louis: The Trestle

Twitter

  • Yours
  • Ours

STL Blogroll

  • Coliseum Lounge Launches TomorrowCount On Downtown St. Louis
    Tuesday, 15 May 2012 20:21
  • St. Louis Mourns A JournalistCount On Downtown St. Louis
    Tuesday, 15 May 2012 07:46
  • Cherokee Street, 1997-2002STL-Style Blog
    Monday, 14 May 2012 12:57
  • Cupples 9 Lands Flying SaucerCount On Downtown St. Louis
    Monday, 14 May 2012 10:12
  • Tour de Grove Draws HundredsCount On Downtown St. Louis
    Sunday, 13 May 2012 05:00
  • St. Louis Centre Part Six: Strange ReinventionVanishing STL
    Wednesday, 09 May 2012 07:29
  • St. Louis Centre Part Five - The End of the MallVanishing STL
    Wednesday, 02 May 2012 01:52
  • Green MachineSTL Rising
    Monday, 30 April 2012 03:28
  • Open for Business: The St. Louis Chamber of Commerce?STL Rising
    Thursday, 26 April 2012 03:23
  • City of St. Louis Sustainability Summit Meetings: May 8-12STL Rising
    Wednesday, 25 April 2012 03:50
  • A Cherokee landmark restored!STL-Style Blog
    Friday, 20 April 2012 05:10
  • A Needless Loss in the Central West EndVanishing STL
    Friday, 20 April 2012 01:22
  • Two Days Left for Public Comment on Lid AlternativesVanishing STL
    Wednesday, 18 April 2012 02:07
  • City Affair to Host Visioning Session for Hospital SiteVanishing STL
    Wednesday, 11 April 2012 01:17
  • Lid Study Officially UnderwaySTL Rising
    Tuesday, 10 April 2012 02:34

Recent Comments

Locale

  • Downtown
  • North City
  • South City
  • Central Corridor
  • St. Louis County
  • Greater St. Louis - Missouri
  • Greater St. Louis - Illinois

Focus Areas

  • Urban Living
  • Placemaking
  • Transportation
  • Preservation
  • Environment
  • Media
  • What Should Be

Local Resources

  • Groth Neighborhood Guides
  • Pictorial St. Louis - 1875
  • Landmark's Assoc. of STL
  • MO History Museum Research
  • Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
  • Geo St. Louis - GIS Data

Urban Resources

    • Project for Public Spaces
    • Sustainable Cities Collective
    • Planetizen
    • Next American City
    • Streetsblog.net
    • The Urbanophile
Copyright nextSTL, 2012, All Rights Reserved