A Better Alternative to “Most Dangerous Cities” Ranking: St. Louis and Kansas City

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook266Share on Reddit18Share on LinkedIn52Print this pageEmail this to someone

Many City Mayors complain that “city” rankings are not accurate because cities are defined by city limits, which are determined by politics, not consistent rules of population statistics.  Rust belt cities typically have city limits locked in place encircling a small old inner portion of the metropolitan area and containing few if any low-crime suburbs.  Newer Western cities, by contrast, cast their city limits far out into farm fields and contain the majority of their metro low crime suburbs, which dilutes their average crime rates.

OKC city limits

But ranking institutions put both types of cities into the same “city” ranking, and then declare the cities with the most crime per resident as the most dangerous. Since the general public associate cities with entire regions, “city limit” rankings can unfairly paint an entire region as crime riddled while masking growing crime issues in so-called “hot” younger cities. These rankings tell us almost nothing about personal danger, since any city can change its ranking just by moving its city limit boundary without actually lowering crime.

By contrast, crime rankings based on Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), instead of city limits, use metro boundaries set consistently, metro to metro, by the Federal government with statistical rules based on population. For some reason, these more valid MSA rankings are ignored by the media. In 2012, Forbes Magazine switched from MSA crime ranking to a city limits crime ranking, with scant rationale, saying “We used cities instead of larger metropolitan statistical areas, which gave the disadvantage to older cities with tighter boundaries.”

MSAs usually have inner business cores at their centers, older smaller homes and multi-family homes further out, and suburbs beyond that. I contend that statisticians could do a much better job of comparing major cities by going down to the zip code level and identifying zip codes in the inner 10%, 20%, 30% etc. of their MSAs for crime statistics.

Then one could compare the inner 10% core of the Pittsburgh metro area, say, with the inner 10% core of the Houston metro area if one was planning to live near downtown. Or compare the 50% population ring of two metros for folks comparing suburbs.  But that takes some work, and most crime rankers just paste FBI tables into a spreadsheet, combine crime categories into a single score for each city, and then sort on that score. This is something almost anyone could do in an afternoon.

I decided to take my own advice and see how hard it would be to go onto the internet and address just two cities using the percent of population rings approach to compare crime rates. I chose to compare St. Louis and Kansas City. St. Louis is the last old eastern city as you go West, and KC could be seen as the first western city.

In the free 2014 CQ Press Cities Crime Ranking, St. Louis ranked at #5 worst for crime while Kansas City ranked better at #61.  But in the 2014 CQ Press Metro Ranking, the orders were reversed with Kansas City ranking worse at #52, while St. Louis ranked safer at #95.  So I was anxious to see how the plots would show a transition as the data extended further from City Hall.


Here are the steps I used to plot St. Louis and Kansas City crime.  The same steps and data sources (links at the end of the piece) work for all metro areas.

Method for Average Crime index for percent population rings from City Hall.  10%, 20%, etc.

  1. Find zip codes for each Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)
  2. Find LAT LONG of City Hall of the primary city of each MSA and each MSA Zip Code area
  3. Compute distance of each zip code from city hall in miles with LAN LONG to mile conversion.
  4. Get Crime Index for each zip code
  5. Get population for each zip code
  6. Determine distance rings containing 10% of the population, 20%, etc.
  7. Identify specific zip codes within each ring
  8. Compute total crime index for each % ring using zip code crime index weighted by population.
  9. Plot crime index for the 10% population ring, 20% ring, etc. as a bar chart.

I was able to find free databases online for each of the steps in this approach, but it was a bit tedious copying crime indexes by zip code from one of various neighborhood data realty sites and pasting the indexes into my spreadsheet one at a time.  Professional researchers could probably purchase the entire crime-by-zip-code database in XL format to make that part a lot easier.

I computed the distances from City Hall for 10% of the metro populations, 20%, 30%, etc. at these distances. Table 1.  Distance from City Hall where 10%, 20%, etc. of the metro population live:

Percent of MSA Population 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Miles from City Hall – St. Louis 4.35 7.04 9.81 12.15 14.65 17.87 21.28 28.11 37.45 65.00
Miles from City Hall – Kansas City 3.79 6.50 8.63 10.16 12.38 15.08 17.59 20.18 28.03 69.00

I realized that since St. Louis and Kansas City metro areas are fairly similar, it would be interesting and pretty easy to go through step 4 above and just plot zip code crime indexes for each zip code as a function of distance from city hall.  The data include zip code areas in Illinois for St. Louis, and Kansas for Kansas City as well as Missouri zip codes.


Here is the scatter plot of zip code crime indexes vs. distance from City Hall for St. Louis and Kansas City. US average crime index is 100.

Figure 1.  Zip Code Crime Index by miles from City Hall for St. Louis and Kansas City Metros:

STL KCMO crime index v distance from city hall

The website posting the crime index for each zip code said the index is a combination of rape, murder, assault, robbery, burglary, larceny and vehicle theft normalized against a US average score of 100.  So 200 means twice the average US crime.  The counts of each crime category are unweighted according to the web site, so murder counts the same as robbery.

Continuing with the remaining steps to get a bar chart of crime indexes by percent of metro area rings, I combine crime indexes within each percent ring.  For this, I weighted the indexes by zip code population, so a zip code with just 3 people would contribute proportionally less than one with 1,000 people within a percent ring.  I collected data up through the 90% ring.  For the full metro numbers, I computed the St Louis and Kansas City crime indexes directly from the FBI data tables.

Here is the crime index bar chart for each percent ring of population out to 60% from City Hall.

Figure 2.  Crime Index by 10% rings of population out from City Hall:

STL v KCMO crime index

And here is what the data looks at the 10% core, the entire inner 50% of the metro population and the full metro.

Figure 3.  Crime Index for 10% core, the entire inner 50% of the metro population, and the full metro:

STL v KCMO crime

Since St. Louis and Kansas City are similar in size, the bar chart information roughly lines up with the distance scatter plot.  If I was comparing St. Louis to a much smaller or larger metro, the percentage bar chart would be more useful.

Here are maps of St. Louis and Kansas City with the Crime Index shown as a number from 1 to 6, where 6 represents crime 6 times the national average.  The links below the maps go to short videos of each map in a circling motion to see around the data pillars.

Figure 4.  St. Louis Crime Index by Zip Code (US average = 1):

STL crime

Figure 5.  Kansas City Crime Index by Zip Code (US average = 1):

KCMO crime


I was surprised at how different the plots turned out between the two cities. As expected, core areas of both metros have higher crime rates, and suburbs have lower crime rates. Since the full St. Louis metro crime rate is lower than the full Kansas City metro crime rate, I was guessing that the two metros were similar enough in configuration that St. Louis would come out slightly safer at every percent of population and distance out from City Hall.

Instead I learned that the inner 20% of St. Louis zip codes had at least a 20% higher crime index than their Kansas City counterparts. I was even more surprised to see how much safer St. Louis inner suburbs are than their Kansas City counterparts. The Kansas City crime index was at least 40% higher than St. Louis for the 30% through 60% population rings. The higher suburban crime in Kansas City more than makes up for the higher inner core crime in St Louis to account for the overall higher crime rate in the entire Kansas City metro area.

The crimes per person may be higher in St. Louis inner core because the number of people living there has plummeted over the last 70 years until recently, while the number of people working, driving through, dining, going to sporting events, and doing business in the city is still pretty high. But crime indexes always divide only by the resident count, not the visitor count.

I suspect these patterns may be typical for older rust belt cities where the middle class has moved to larger modern homes in the suburbs long ago, whereas Western cities still have many newer homes close to the central core. Some cities like St. Louis and Detroit have an additional factor pulling residents westward – a central business district built almost out on a peninsula up against a major barrier – the Mississippi River for St. Louis and the Canadian border for Detroit.


If all the City and Metro crime rankings were replaced with charts like these, planners could make better decisions about the status of crime in major cities. This approach completely eliminates the city limits as a factor driving a false ranking. Planners can better see how their metro area stacks up against other metros at similar distance rings when assigning resources to fight crime.

The next step would be to go down to zip code level directly to address specific crime problems within the metro areas. If publishers must have crime rankings to sell magazines, the full MSA boundary ranking, or the 50% inward stats are more representative of relative crime rates.

References and data sources:

Zip Codes that make up each MSA

LAT LONG of each metro – City Hall

Zip Code Area LAT LONGS

Convert difference between two LAT LONGs to statute miles: =ACOS(COS(RADIANS(90-A2)) *COS(RADIANS(90-A3)) +SIN(RADIANS(90-A2)) *SIN(RADIANS(90-A3)) *COS(RADIANS(B2-B3))) *3958.756

Crime rating and population size for each zip code

Population distance spread from City Hall

Zip code map images

FBI Table 6 to get Full Metro Stats to compute full metro counts 2013

FBI Table 1 to get Full US Stats to scale computer full metro crime Indexes 2013 (.XLS)

Total Crime Risk Index Used by Moving.com description (PDF): Total Crime Risk – A score that represents the combined risks of rape, murder, assault, robbery, burglary, larceny and vehicle theft compared to the national average of 100. A score of 200 indicates twice the national average total crime risk, while 50 indicates half the national risk. The different types of crime are given equal weight in this score, so murder, for example, does not count more than vehicle theft. Scores are based on demographic and geographic analyses of crime over seven years.

CQ Press 2014 (2013 data) rankings of safest cities (PDF) and safest metro areas (PDF).

Forbes Most Dangerous Cities:

2011 When Forbes used the MSA Ranking

2012 When Forbes switched to the City Limits Ranking

Gary Kreie is a recently retired missile software engineer and recent empty nester considering places to move for downsizing.


Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook266Share on Reddit18Share on LinkedIn52Print this pageEmail this to someone
  • illusion87

    Interesting data, nice work.

  • Sean Snyder

    Seems like using the same legends might make the graphics easier to interpret. Good work regardless. Thanks.

  • rgbose

    What’s with the big red bar in SW city? Is property crime accounting for that?

    • That looks like zip 63109. When I enter 63109 into moving.com it returns a total crime risk of 558. Moving.com says
      “Total Crime Risk – A score that represents the combined risks of rape, murder, assault, robbery, burglary, larceny and vehicle theft compared to the national average of 100. A score of 200 indicates twice the national average total crime risk, while 50 indicates half the national risk. The different types of crime are given equal weight in this score, so murder, for example, does not count more than vehicle theft. Scores are based on demographic and geographic analyses of crime over seven years.”

      So their score includes all 8 of the FBI Table 6 crime categories for the zip code EXCEPT property crime.

      They do not say per person, so maybe a zip code could have a high score because it has an unusually high number of residents and hence more total crime compared to other zip codes.

      • rgbose

        63109 has 26,946 residents, if that helps

        • I looked a little more into why 63109 might have been assigned a high crime index. This site shows individual crimes.
          It seems to show a big crime cluster around Chippewa and South Kingshighway. That intersection is just barely in 63109. It also shows that the rest of the zip code appear to have as few or fewer crime incidents than South St. Louis County.

    • illusion87

      Have you ever drove a little south/east of Tower Grove? There’s your explanation.

      • rgbose

        That’s 63118. I’m talking about 63109, perceived to be the safest places in the city.

  • Chris

    It’s really irritating to hear people from St. Louis trying to prove that crime isn’t that bad in STL and that it would look so much better if the numbers could be padded by expanding the city. Yes, expanding the city limits would give you numbers closer to KC, but is that a model city to compare crime rates to? San Francisco and Boston are both cities that have very small defined borders that don’t have the crime in their small areas that STL does. I feel like too many people put effort into trying to pad STL crime numbers instead of actually looking at the cause of all the crime—namely decades of racist policies and a lack of diversity in neighborhoods. The region is still building out and not up which has proven to be a poor way to plan urban regions.

    • Chicagoan

      Every city works to manipulate the numbers to skew the conversation in to their favor.

    • Larry Guinn

      Here is an article from this web site regarding a press release utilizing FBI stats to compare metro areas. San Francisco is not a good choice for you to champion. Boston looks good with an overall low crime rate.

      • John R

        Larry, that’s Metro data from 2013… San Fran city has much lower violent crime than STL City. Also, our metro homicide rate has jumped significantly since ’13.

        • John R

          here’s the FBI UCR data from 2014…
          big jump for STL as you can see. for metro homicide; 2015 data will be even higher, unfortunately.

          • Larry Guinn

            My point is the overall stats are compared, not individual categories of crime. I can pick out things that are terrible about Saint Louis, or about any city and talk about that. Media likes to hang a most terrible sign on Saint Louis and it’s accepted as being for all of Saint Louis. When the stats are boiled down to a metro area and averaged out, you can get a bigger picture of what that region is about, rather than types of crime in portions of the region.

        • Larry Guinn

          The compiled stats for crime are always a year or two being the present year.

      • Chris

        That article compares metro areas, not individual cities. In my opinion, comparing metro areas is too broad because public policy and police forces are supplied on the city level, not the metro level. Here is the data on the city level. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_crime_rate_(2014)

        • John R

          I see where you’re coming from but I find all data useful.. knowing both city level and metro level numbers helps inform.

          And I like Gary’s population and distance rings… it’s interesting to see how the core compares from one city to the next; for example, if crime is indeed significantly lower in and near downtown in other cities, this might help explain why ours seems to lag a bit in comparison to peer cities.

        • jhoff1257

          I disagree. Metro comparisons make much more sense considering many cities, like Houston and KC (and nearly every other western and southern city), have annexed hundreds of square miles of farmland and suburban development. How exactly is it fair to compare STL City with it’s with it’s 60 square miles to Houston with it’s 630? Or KC’s 320 (much of which is still actually farmland)? Or Jacksonville’s 874? Also where exactly does the author talk about shielding crime. We all know St. Louis has a significant crime problem, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with putting that into context with other cities we are routinely compared with.

          I’ve even seen these stupid lists for most dangerous cities in the world that have St. Louis above Damascus, Syria, cities in Somalia, Baghdad, etc. Unfortunately people are stupid enough to actually think St. Louis is worse then some of the most war torn cities on the planet. Context like this is a good thing.

    • John R

      As noted below, I find this piece useful (although cautioning it’s only looking at one year and I do feel there is a major difference between property crimes and violent crimes) but when you bring up Boston and San Francisco, you are spot on that these are the types of small geography cities we desperately need to emulate not just with crime but almost across the board.

      Minneapolis can be added to that list and in many ways I think Pittsburgh (which is smaller in land) and even Cincinnati and Cleveland (which are somewhat larger in land but still under 80 sq. mi.) to some extent..

      • Alex Ihnen

        (Very) short take: Boston and San Francisco are much, much wealthier than STL = less crime. Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh are quite analogous and show that there is something quite different and terrible happening in St. Louis.

    • Alex Ihnen

      It’s also irritating to time and time again see any writing that provides context to the crime in St. Louis criticized as “trying to prove that crime isn’t that bad in STL”.

      • duckusucker

        Sorry ’bout the delay in replying but that’s Google for you.
        The fact is that the aggregate of crime in both cities is WAY off the norm. A victim of crime doesn’t get much consolation by knowing that she was a visitor to an area or a resident.

    • illusion87

      I put a checkmark next to your name for “idiot” when you said “cause of all the crime-decades of racist policies.”

      • Chris

        Yes, I suggest you read a book before trolling.

  • John R

    The Saint Louis region is the type of place that will shoot you but not necessarily take your stuff so the metro rankings as a whole, when taking into account Tier 1 property crimes, fares relatively high. But both STL and KC metros are homicide hot beds.

    In fact, just STL City and KCMO together have nearly as many homicides as the whole of New York City. It’s unacceptable that these two mid-sized cities, with a combined population of about 750,000, have a shared homicide count that is almost as high as a dense, urbanized city with a population 10x larger. Yet we accept it.

    • Ben Harvey

      Well to be fair New York City is so dense that it actually prevents crime from happening. There are always eyes on the street thus less crime

      • John R

        That is a great point; functioning density can be a very good thing. But it still boogles the mind how say, North City, with under 100,000 people, has more homicides than say The Bronx, with almost 1,500,000.

      • Chicagoan

        “Eyes on the street”

        /Jane Jacobs’d

      • duckusucker

        Uh, no. NYC was a leading homicide center not so long ago and it was just as population-dense then. Police leaders named Maple and Bannon turned it around.
        FYI, Rio and S. Paulo, Brazil, are murder hotbeds and their densities are very concentrated.

  • marigolds6

    You might want to try different iterations of the crime index. The volume of larceny is so much greater than other crimes in the index that an unweighted index is basically just a larceny index rather than an overall crime index.

    • The moving.com (owned by realtor.com) did not provide a breakdown at the zip code level. So I was stuck with their one number index. But since the FBI tables for metro areas says the murder rate for metro KC is higher than the one for metro STL, it helps KC to not weight muder higher vs other crimes.