BJC Looks to Push Central West End MetroLink to Kingshighway, Again

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Reddit0Share on LinkedIn0Print this pageEmail this to someone

When the St. Louis Development Corporation published their request for proposals for transit-oriented development consulting services, they included in the document a desire to study the possibility of relocating the Central West End MetroLink station from Euclid to Kingshighway. What the SLDC did not include was any reasons why it was considering moving the Central West End station. Nor did it mention that ideas to relocate or redesign the Central West End stop have been floated repeatedly since well before MetroLink opened for service.

What's Old May Become New Again:

CWE MetroLink stop
{a 1984 drawing shows an underground MetroLink station at Kingshighway}

Plans from the 1984 draft environment impact study for what would become MetroLink did not originally call for a Central West End station at Euclid. Rather, they show drawings of the station located just east of Kingshighway underneath the garage for Childrens' Hospital. The primary station entrance would have taken people from street level at Kingshighway to the eastbound platform below (at the time, MetroLink stations were being planned with 4" high platforms with mid-station(!) crossings to reach the far-side platform). The station would have also been accessible from Euclid, but only after a long walk not to dissimilar to the walk from Taylor to the existing station.

By the time the final EIS report was published in 1987, the proposed location for the Central West End station had moved to its present day spot at Euclid. No explanation is given in the FEIS as to why the station was moved. Entering Through the Back Door

MetroLink opened for service on July 31, 1993 and was an immediate success. Since then, the Central West End station and its surroundings have grown to become the powerhouse of the system.

The Central West End station is the busiest in the MetroLink system with almost 6000 boardings per weekday during the summer. It is 50% busier than the Forest Park-DeBaliviere station, the second busiest in the system. The station's existing location not only efficiently serves the vast majority of BJC's medical campus, but it's place on Euclid allows it to serve the southern reaches of the Central West End neighborhood to the north.

Still, the shine had barely worn off the region's new light-rail system when BJC made its first request to relocate the Central West End station. From a 1997 St. Louis Business Journal article, a time when vehicles could still travel the length of any road within the medical campus:

BJC Health System wants the Central West End MetroLink station on Euclid Avenue relocated to Kingshighway as part of its $225 million redevelopment project at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

BJC has asked its architect, Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum Inc., to look at the feasibility of relocating the station as it develops the master plan for renovation and development at Barnes-Jewish. If the project gets on track, BJC will pick up the tab.

"The station would be located at our front door instead of our back door," said BJC Health System spokeswoman Kathy Bretsch. "Euclid is really congested, and we're hoping to ease some of that."

It's interesting to look back and see BJC complaining about the level of congestion on Euclid and within the medical campus then caused by an overflow of cars and busses competing for space with pedestrians. Many years later, BJC would begin the process of closing off streets that has recently turned Euclid into a kind of urban oasis.

It's also interesting to see how BJC perceived its campus, that Euclid was its backdoor and Kingshighway the front door. At the time, the congestion and dreary landscape along Euclid certainly offered little respite, whereas Kingshighway, with Forest Park nearby, could offer a glimmer of calm and serenity, that is if you could get away from the din of traffic.

But what is truly fascinating within the excerpt above—the line regarding BJC's perceived front and back doors—is that it would be repeated… almost 15 years later.

Like Minds Think Alike:

CWE MetroLink stop
{credit: BJC Request for Inspiraton video – image from Skidmore, Owings & Merrill presentation}

Last month, BJC released a video showcasing the work of a trio of urban design firms and collaborators. The video presented a vision for inspiration for how BJC and CORTEX could and should expand and fill in to become a true hub for health sciences and technology.

Perhaps the most impressive presentation is the second clip presented by Skdimore, Owings & Merrill. Aside from providing a fantastic overview of their work through flyovers and stills of the future BJC campus and CORTEX area, an excellent narration helps provide detail on some of the thoughts they put into the planning process.

One of the most intriguing parts of the narration given by SOM is a line at the 6:40 mark: "We imagine Kingshighway as a front door to the medical center."

Though perhaps without knowing it, SOM repeated an idea first voiced by BJC 15 years ago. The idea is interesting because it seems to perfectly capture how BJC and the general public view and have viewed the medical campus, that its public face fronts Kingshighway and looks upon Forest Park.

But the opinion that Kinghighway is the front door to the BJC medical campus is grounded on a fallacious perspective. BJC's campus spans over 1500 feet along Kinghighway. In that span, there is only a single door designed as a main entrance to the buildings. That door, which leads to the Emergency and Trauma Center, is tucked behind a small circular driveway and lacks a direct sidewalk connection. The assumption is that you will drive or be driven to the hospital.

And that is the perspective BJC has taken with it's campus: a driver's perspective. The hospital's skyscrapers look their best and most impressive when viewed from afar whether it'd be approaching the med campus from Kinghighway, down I-64 or from Steinberg Rink or the the athletic fields in Forest Park (the best view, and the preferred view of architecture firms everywhere, is from a helicopter flyover).

Euclid is another matter entirely. Here on the "back" side of the med campus where the Central West End MetroLink station currently resides, BJC has carried out a marvelous transformation. Whereas Euclid and its side streets were once dark and bleak congested with the conflicting movements of cars, busses, and pedestrians, today the streets are a kind of urban oasis. This oasis was the product of a collaboration between MVVA and Maya Lin and built at the same time as the new BJC Institute of Health, a building which replaced a parking garage and sits atop the MetroLink tracks.

The transformation of the space occupied by the new BJC Plaza is no doubt relished by the thousands of MetroLink riders who walk through the space everyday. Since day one, the station has been extremely well used owing to its proximity to the vast majority of the buildings in the medical campus. It is also well used by residents and patrons of the Central West End. Tom's Bar and Grill, Wildflower, and Brasserie are just some of the great restaurants located about a quarter-mile from the MetroLink stop.

But these restaurants, and the commercial heart of the Central West End, would be much farther away from a high quality line of public transit were the MetroLink station to move to Kingshighway. So would many medical buildings. Whereas a station located on Kingshighway would still efficiently serve the main part of the medical campus, many of the buildings east of Euclid would require significantly longer walks to reach. Bus riders transferring at the transit center on Taylor would see their walks increase to longer than a quarter-mile (the transit center would be forced to move, but it's difficult to see how it could be located along Kingshighway). And while having such easy access to Forest Park could be seen as a boon for transit riders, the lack of large attractors on the east side of the park does not make up for the loss of access to thousands of jobs.

CWE MetroLink stop
{a Kingshighway station would serve fewer jobs and offer a worse connection to surrounding neighborhoods}

Pipe Down

In many ways, it seems that the driving force for moving the Central West End station is entirely aesthetic. For example, in 2010, Washington University hosted a design competition to improve the station's aesthetics and ambiance in conjunction with "renovations" of the adjacent power plant building—a building that incidentally seems to be the source of much consternation.

[Paul Duell], the senior project manager for design and construction for the medical school, had a lingering, unsolved problem. The city’s Central West End Metrolink station, its most active metro stop, lay at his footstep — an ugly site in need of improvement. Although the St. Louis light-rail system has been highly successful, this active stop, which serves both the medical school and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital to form one of the largest nonprofit health-care complexes in the country, greets its approximately 5,000 riders with a daily dose of the medical school’s power plant. Imagine leaving work from patient care, exhausted, and looking up at a slew of pipes carrying steam or waste.

If it Ain't Broke:

{the CWE station offers a functional, if industrial experience for transit riders}

When you look up descriptions of the Central West End station from transit foamers on the internet, "industrial" is one of the words most often used to describe its locale. The pipes and steam and dingy look of some of the buildings near the station hide the fact the area is one of the most walkable neighborhoods in the entire metro area.

Even then, aesthetics are an insufficient reason to relocate the station. Nor should a driver's perspective of the BJC campus be the primary shaper of the way hospital infrastructure is built and located.

A MetroLink station at Kingshighway would likely serve fewer jobs, fewer residents, and fewer stores, restaurants, and businesses than the existing station at Euclid. Forest Park would be a beneficiary of a relocated stop, but only at the expense of the Central West End neighborhood.

BJC must also recognize that thanks to all the improvements they've made along Euclid, that their "back yard" has become their "front yard". In almost every way, the environment of the BJC campus is better on Euclid than it is on Kingshighway. No new building along Kingshighway is going to change that.

And anyway, if the station were relocated to Kingshighway, how would the monorail ever reach it?

CWE MetroLink stop

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Reddit0Share on LinkedIn0Print this pageEmail this to someone
  • Guest

    I wish we had train lines that run along major streets. Instead of moving the station, I would rather see a Kingshighway line with a tunnel connecting to the Euclid station for transfers. In general, it would be great to have more lines. I realize this is just a pipe dream – but hey.

  • TBspqr

    Would it be possible to leave the station where it is and put an underground pedestrian tunnel from BJCs new “big city” subway entrance right off Kingshighway?

    Its only about 900′ from Kingshighway to the Euclid Station. Adjoining buildings could access the tunnel internally. This way BJC gets their desired entrance, their whole campus is more connected to the station, and the CWE keeps their ideal location. Also, I assume its cheaper to make a pedestrian tunnel (where a tunnel already exists) than move a station and BJC would pick up most (or all) of the tab.

  • Steve Kluth

    This has nothing to do with the users of the station and everything to do with how BJC views the station. BJC thinks the CWE Station is solely to support BJC, ignoring the thousands who live and work and socialize in the Central West End. It’s the same, self-centered mentality that justified them and their supporters to build the Cross-County Extension to connect BJC and the main Wash U campus instead of running MetroLink past Forest Park CC, Dogtown, and the Zoo. A station on Kingshighway is far less serviceable to most CWE residents though maybe residents on Portland Place might start using MetroLink instead of their Lexus’s and Mercedes’. I’m sure they’ll still look down their noses at us hoi polloi.

    If BJC doesn’t want people to see the pipes, let them hang some artwork. There are plenty of artists that could use the money. Or if they really want the land (considering their expansionist ways of late, I think this is the real reason for their complaint), let them enclose the station and build above it. I’m cool with that. 

    • eric656

      Any conceivable Cross County Extension would have gone past Wash U on the way to Clayton, whether or not it detoured through Forest Park.

  • Thomas R Shrout Jr

    Call me

  • Douglas Duckworth

    I wonder how many bus lines could be added for the cost of moving one station.  Per usual transit improvements always go for the more affluent first as opposed to the poor who have no other alternative.  Does this plan call for the bus stop being moved out from inside the parking garage or will people have to walk all the way over there to transfer?    

    Euclid Station isn’t the most beautiful, but neither are any of the subway stations in Toronto.  Yet they are crowded as the system works.  It gets people where they need to go.  I don’t think St. Louis is in a position where it can worry about aesthetics when it arguably doesn’t even have a functional regional or urban mass transit system. 

    Here is an idea on how to improve the station: demolish the parking garages and put them underground.   Build some buildings there.  Or at least put up some cladding.  At night they could have LED lighting.   There are a lot of ways to improve this station cosmetically without moving it.  The platform could be enclosed, it could have better furniture, why are these ideas not on the table?       
    Finally, this idea could make sense if there was a significant investment in public infrastructure which might actually promote more transit ridership and active transportation.  Such as separated bike lanes on Kingshighway running from Natural Bridge to Arsenal.  But I doubt BJC cares much about that.   

  • jhoff1257

    What do you guys think of this?  Instead of moving the CWE station to Kingshighway for aesthetic or other reasons, just spruce up the current station.  Bring in some local artists to paint the pipes and the backs of those “industrial” buildings.  Similar to some of the art you can find in The Grove and places like that.  Then contact Gateway Greening and see if they could be persuaded to plant some beautiful landscaping (similar to Downtown plantings) in the grassy areas, and maybe some potted plants on the platform or walkways to and from the platform.  In fact I would recommend local artwork and paintings, and better landscaping from BJC to SLU along the Metro alignment. This would give the entire “Medical/Science” (BJC, CORTEX included) district a unified look while riding on the trains.  I would seriously consider some sort of design or paint job on that grain silo too.  That would be huge if you ask me.

    One thing, I personally don’t think there is anything wrong with the station in it’s current state. But if BJC is bent on improving the look, there are cheaper ways to do it then moving the entire station.

  • Eric

    Personally, I like the industrialized look.  It’s one of my very favorite stations for that reason.

    • Alex Ihnen

      100% absolutely agree. I love the CWE stop because it feels like a city. Is it worth millions for a health care provider to spruce us a transit stop? That station and its surroundings aren’t littered or dingy, they’re just a working part of the complex. Clearly development is going to happen to the north of the stop where there are smaller, older buildings. Put something nice there, cover the stop if you must, but leave it where it is.

      Placing the stop on Kingshighway makes no sense whatsoever. It would be further away from where people want to go in the CWE, further from the CAM, further from residents in FPSE and the CWE. Whether BJC would pay for relocation or not, I don’t think it should happen. It’s “public transit, not BJC transit” – great line.

  • Jeff

    Who the hell cares about the pipes?  That is a ridiculous non-issue and certainly does not justify the need to move the station one entire city block.  Euclid is one of the most pedestrian-friendly streets in the entire city, and it makes sense to keep the station exactly where it is.  After all, the Metro system is PUBLIC transit, not BJC transit.

  • Rgbose

    Agreed, you tell ’em.  While it’s true “the pipes and steam and dingy look of some of the buildings near the station hide the fact the area is one of the most walkable neighborhoods in the entire metro area” moving the station to Kingshighway won’t change that either.  You’ll get off in a tunnel and exit onto a very busy street with sidewalks right on the street.  The pedestrian experience is much better served by Euclid nowadays.  
    Given the station’s popularity it seems the aesthetics aren’t bothering many.  I’d say the Grand station is more negatively impacted by its aesthetics (though mostly its location).  
    Lots or people make transfers to buses here.  The station is already far from the Bus transfer center, don’t make it further away.  
    Put resources elsewhere!