A Modest Proposal

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on RedditEmail this to someone

Pruitt-Igoe Demolition

It is a melancholy object to those who drive through this great town or bike on Jefferson Avenue, when they see the trees that now occupy the Pruitt-Igoe housing project site.

Pruitt-Igoe

The area, nay a large portion of the city of St. Louis, was devastated by housing and transportation policies, enacted by governments far away in Jefferson City and Washington DC, and an economy that followed its encouragement. The site itself was leveled for the high rise projects which lasted less than 20 years, the surroundings left to decay after the riptide of sprawl unmercifully wreaked havoc on the urban landscape. The area has no economy. It is a liability to the city and state.

I think it is agreed by all parties that over the decades many false starts, half-hearted government programs, and good intentioned efforts have failed to put the area back together again. The latest is the Northside Regeneration Plan. The city passed a $390M TIF for it and sold an option on the Pruitt-Igoe site and many other LRA properties. The state passed a special Land Assemblage Tax Credit just for this project. Paul McKee knows he must produce new jobs in the area for it and him to be a success.

As to my own part, having turned my thoughts for many years upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the several schemes of other projectors, I have always found them grossly mistaken in the computation. Clearly the area needs good, stable jobs, and the state sees its turn-around as a priority. I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection: move the state capital to St. Louis, specifically the Pruitt-Igoe site.

State Capital on Pruitt-Igoe

{The state capital fits quite nicely}

It would heal the scar left by bad government policies at the Pruitt-Igoe site. Some of our worst-off citizens would be a stones throw from their state government. They could access some of the state jobs. They could better access the levers of power. The extra security for the capitol would help deter crime in the area.

There is plenty of room on the site for the capitol building and the surroundings would be well suited for the department office buildings. Also the almost empty AT&T building downtown would make a good location for state offices. And all the state employees could reside in the new housing of the Northside Regeneration area.

Distant capitals nurture bad policy and corruption. They are far away from numerous constituents and major media outlets. It is difficult for “regular people” to make the trek to Jefferson City to testify or met legislators from other parts of the state. Notice how much local shenanigans get covered compared to business in the state house on local TV. This enhances accountability. In the people’s absence special interests reign.

Missouri State Capital

We Can Do It!There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, urban issues would get proper due at the state level. Legislators would be more interested in mass transit funding for instance, if they actually saw someone using it while in St. Louis. The Governor might mention school transfers and inner-city violence in his State of the State Address, and he may even say the words “urban,” “St. Louis,” and “Kansas City.” They would realize that most of the state economy hums in its two big metro areas and be more interested in building cities that attract talent rather than undermine them. There would be greater support for incentives like the China Hub and historic tax credits. They would see the damage caused by sprawl and stop promoting it through state-subsidized infrastructure. With St. Louis and Kansas City better off the returns to the state abound.

Shall we build a new capitol or move the old one? It’s a beautiful building full of history and treasures. I say move it. The old building would inspire good design in all the new Northside construction and ensure we avoid architectural tragedies like Aventura. It would be an extraordinary engineering challenge for sure. But if we can pick up and move over the Popular Street Bridge for the sake of saving a minute or two, surely we can move the capital.

Beach at CapitalHow do we do it? First deconstruct the dome and truck it to St. Louis; this creates lots of jobs. Dredge out a path from the Missouri River to the capitol building; this creates lots of jobs. We’d have to build an under water tunnel for the UP rail lines; this creates lots of jobs. The left over inlet would make a great water park and beach area for Jefferson City. Call it the Beach Over the Railway Envisioned (BORE). A TIF and local sales tax could help pay for a water resort hotel like the Kalahari in Sandusky, OH. This will require the demolition of some obsolete buildings for the necessary parking. The vacated state office buildings could be re-purposed as housing for the state’s homeless. Surplus housing could be demolished for grassy fields, farms, or a radioactive waste dump.

Capital on Barge

{Starboard 360. Full stream ahead!}

Build a barge big enough for it; this creates lots of jobs. Build a crawler-transporter nine times bigger than the one for the Space Shuttle, and put it on the barge; this creates lots of jobs. Make sure this will all fit under the bridges of the Missouri and Mississippi. If they don’t clear, build new bridges; this creates lots of jobs.

Path to PI Site

Land just south of the Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge. Make a 300-foot wide ~1.5 mile long path from the river along Cass Ave (rename it Capitol Ave); this creates lots of jobs. Seems fitting that the statue of Thomas Jefferson be at the corner of Jefferson and Capitol. Fill in the orphaned I-70 lanes. With the Musial Bridge open it is clear to all to build the boulevard so we’d want to fill it in anyways.

Capital on Transporter

What buildings that are torn down call it Urban Renewal, or we can make a great new mall from the capital to the river. Rebuild the dome; this creates lots of jobs!

How do we pay for it? We should pass a state-wide 1% general sales tax. My estimate for the move is $2 billion, so the tax could sunset after 3 years. I estimate the move will create 67,500 jobs. On top of that the new state government activity would create 17,000 new jobs.


{MoDOT “Jobs Supported” Chart}

No net job gain you say? I can count them; everyone else does.

I profess, in the sincerity of my heart, that I have not the least personal interest in endeavoring to promote this necessary work, having no other motive than the public good of my state. By moving the capital, Jefferson City can become a sleepy river town freed from all the big-city hustle and bustle of being the seat of state government, and St. Louis (and Kansas City for that matter) can get their proper respect.

(If you’re not familiar with “A Modest Proposal”)

Pin It
  • T-Leb

    “Distant capitals nurture bad policy and corruption” … right, b/c StL doesn’t have that issue without being a state capital.

    You want different results out of Jefferson City? Then you need to take a hard look at the politicians that the St. Louis region sends to Jeff City.

    • jhoff1257

      I don’t think anybody is saying STL doesn’t have those problems on it’s own. But the State of Missouri doesn’t do much to help…at all.

  • hairylarry5

    Is this article a joke? It seems like one you would find on the onion.

    • chaifetz10

      I bet you didn’t click on the link at the bottom of the article, did you? It’s definitely a satirical article filled with hyperbole and analogies.

      • jhoff1257

        Hairylarry5 must be a State Legislator.

  • Presbyterian

    I am concerned that this proposal seems overly modest. I shall call it A Modester Proposal. A proposal that would be merely modest (and not modester) is to move the state capital in its entirety — move Jefferson City — to St. Louis. Those houses could provide decent infill throughout the city and inner ring suburbs. St. Louis would grow by 100,000 people, and Jefferson City would survive as a concept.

  • John R

    I’m on board with this modest proposal, but would it be immodest if me to ask if we can include a move of Saint Louis City Hall to Clayton as well?

    • rgbose

      Another great engineering feat for sure! Something to put on that pesky Shaw Park. Missed a great opportunity to move it while I-64 was being rebuilt. City Hall not withstanding, methinks Clayton has gotten enough from St. Louis.

      • John R

        Clayton would only be a mere neighborhood with this move!

  • matimal

    Local governments are created by state governments. If Missouri local government were very different, St. Louis would be very different.

  • John R

    Once we get this move done, I think the next thing to do is have a cultural exchange with other cities around the world . Think how cool it would be to loan the Arch to Paris while we enjoy the Leaning Tower of Pisa or Statue of Liberty! Tourism would be through the roof and think of all the jobs!

  • Jackie D

    Moving the State government to St Louis proposal starts with making reference to its current distance from the City. Moving it here will make it further away from the largest city in the State and further from the second, third, and fourth largest metropolitan areas in the State.

    • Andrew L

      Also, the consideration of shipping the buildings by barge is impractical. There are width and height restrictions on the rivers (LOCKS, BRIDGE DECKS, BRIDGE PILLARS).

      • rgbose

        Good point, forgot about the locks. Luckily there is only one, Granite City Lock and Dam, in the Chain of Rocks Canal. We can rebuild it bigger. I’m sure Illinois would be glad to pick up the tab. It would create a lot of jobs.

    • dogtown dude

      I don’t understand why this matters? Why does proximity to these other larger cities and smaller metro areas matter? Please do explain for us all? What is the precedent set to exemplify this concept?